Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3401 14
Original file (NR3401 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

7oOi Ss. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

HD
Docket No: NR3401-14
11 September 2014.

 

Dear Chief

 

ab sae

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552. ,

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

-11 September 2014. Your-allegations of error and injustice were

reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel
Command dated 8 July 2014, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to

establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the advisory

opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names -

and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It igs regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of

regularity attaches’ to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

Sincerely,

   

ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3782 14

    Original file (NR3782 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support therecf and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR777 14

    Original file (NR777 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1724 14

    Original file (NR1724 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO1724-14 11 September 2014 This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction of Naval Record (DD Form Da Gy « A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1841 14

    Original file (NR1841 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on >6 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 15 May 2014, a copy of which is attached, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8674 13

    Original file (NR8674 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 7 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8329 13

    Original file (NR8329 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13) memo of 17 Jul 2014, a copy of which was provided to ‘you en 11 Aug 2014. Conseguently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3739 14

    Original file (NR3739 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5131 13

    Original file (NR5131 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2102 14

    Original file (NR2102 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/144 dated 11 July 2014, a Copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2101 14

    Original file (NR2101 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NSSC letter 4050 Ser 142/079 dated 6 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 1s on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...